Asialaw - Clarity for Corporate Counsel




Supplements


Conferences and events

Structured finance reforms compared

Date: February 2010

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

  • All comments are subject to editorial review.


  • (Receive email notification of new comments posted by other users)

EMAIL A FRIEND




  • (To include more than one recipient, please separate each name with a semi-colon ';')


  • To include more than one recipient, please seperate each email address with a semi-colon ';'


By Rachel Evans

Andrew Malcolm, head of capital markets at Linklaters in Hong Kong, analyses the different approaches to structured finance reform in Hong Kong and Singapore

Following the release of Singapore’s reforms to structured finance at the end of January (and a new consultation paper on further changes) we can now see how Singapore’s approach compares to that taken by Hong Kong so far.

What’s clear, and what we hope is encouraging from Hong Kong’s perspective, is that the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) seems to be listening to the feedback and responses it’s received.

The full version of this story is available at www.iflr.com.